Atlas Is Exhausted: Who’s Really Holding the Sky?
- Millicent
- Jul 30, 2025
- 5 min read
You ever notice how working-class labor is basically the silent Atlas of modern society—straining under the weight of the world—while the rich climb onto his shoulders to take Instagram selfies, sipping artisan lattes as if they held it all up themselves? This isn’t a rant; it’s a reality check (The Guardian, 2025).
Wealth: Born, Not Earned
By 2045, over $84 trillion will pass from baby boomers to their heirs, and most of it will stay in the hands of the already wealthy (Financial Times).
We like to tell ourselves that anyone can “make it,” but wealth is one of the strongest predictors of future wealth. Studies show that inheritance locks privilege in place, ensuring that the children of the rich stay rich while the rest fight uphill (Oxford University Press). While working hard to provide for your children and future descendants is something many of us deeply value, the way that inheritance is framed matters. When wealth is passed down without conversations about responsibility, ethics, or the social consequences of power, you wind up with third-generation CEOs who can devastate thousands of lives with the stroke of a pen. With one policy change—say, cutting retirement matching from 4% to 1.5%—they protect their own profits while stripping stability from the very people whose labor sustains their fortune. Inherited privilege without consciousness breeds entitlement that feels natural, even righteous, to those who have never seen the costs of their comfort.
The Working Poor: Subsidizing Their Own Exploitation
While inherited wealth cushions one side, the other is breaking its back. Over 56% of public assistance spending—SNAP, Medicaid, TANF—goes to households where someone is already working, often full-time (Washington Post).
Taxpayers essentially subsidize corporations that refuse to pay living wages. The UC Berkeley Labor Center estimates that low wages cost the public around $150 billion a year (UC Berkeley Labor Center).
And all the while, the public message is that we “need to cut welfare because people are lazy and don’t want to work.” Except here’s the truth: in many states, you cannot receive welfare if you’re not working or actively looking for work, and benefits are often temporary or tightly limited. Welfare isn’t a cushy free ride—it’s a lifeline for people whose labor already props up someone else’s wealth. The real welfare queens aren’t single mothers—they’re corporations and executives whose profits are protected while taxpayers pick up the tab for the basics their workers can’t afford.
The Bubble of Inherited Ignorance
When wealthy parents default to the phrase, “If they don’t want to work, they don’t need to be here,” they erase the reality that most people do want to work—but not at the expense of their health, dignity, or lives. Corporate labor isn’t charity—it’s survival (real things Millicent's heard parents she has worked for say to their kids).
What happens in privileged spheres: voices that could offer truth—like housekeeping staff or tipped servers—remain silent, afraid of crossing unwritten class boundaries or seeming "ungrateful" or like a "troublemaker". Without dissenting perspectives, children of privilege live in curated comfort and echo chambers, never forced to consider consequences or inequality.
Employer Manipulation: Cutting Hours to Dodge Coverage
Here’s how this entitlement fractures into real damage:
ACA’s "30-hour rule" incentivized employers to cut workers’ hours just below full-time thresholds to avoid paying for health insurance. Many firms explicitly scheduled shifts at 29 hours/week (Economics brief; American Action Forum).
In California, 2% of employers forced full-time workers into part-time status before ACA enforcement, while 15% added hours to existing part-timers to reclassify labor as cheaper (UC Berkeley Labor Center).
Nationally, 500,000–700,000 workers (mostly in retail, hospitality, food service) became involuntarily part-time because employers reduced hours to sidestep benefit mandates (Journal of Human Resources).
Even giants like Walmart cut healthcare eligibility for employees working under 30 hours—affecting tens of thousands—while simultaneously promoting low wages as “efficiency” (Wikipedia: Criticism of Walmart).
These cuts might seem like minor scheduling decisions... until you’re the person forced to choose between rent and insulin.
Health, Insecurity & Invisible Cracks
Part-time workers—especially involuntary part-time workers—suffer significantly in self-rated health. In one study, 10.9% of involuntary part-time employees rated their health as fair or poor, compared to just 5.6% of full-time workers (PMC). These conditions are structural—not individual failings—and yet they get erased in elite discourse.
The Real Bubble: Privilege Without Accountability
When execs and social elites avoid ever confronting the reality of labor, wage suppression, or public burden, they foster ignorance. This is not naivety—it’s deliberate invisibility. From offshore tax havens to shrinking benefit matches, the steps are incremental—but the cumulative damage, massive.
These wealthy circles travel the world for selfies, attend sumptuous galas, and hire influencers to cultivate curated narratives—never meeting the people they exploit. Meanwhile, those they employ face eviction risk, medical debt, and unstable gig scheduling. Their labor is necessary—but their voices are silenced.
And all the while, the narrative of hustle culture and toxic positivity keeps grinding away at those same workers. People are told that success is just a matter of working harder, sacrificing sleep, and “wanting it more.” When their bodies and minds inevitably give out—when burnout, chronic illness, or mental health struggles take hold—they’re labeled as weak, lazy, or “just not cut out for it.” This messaging frames systemic exploitation as personal failure, convincing people that if they can’t keep up with an inhuman pace, they’re morally or mentally defective, rather than victims of a deliberately unsustainable system (Harvard Business Review).
This double bind benefits those at the top: workers are too exhausted to resist, too ashamed to demand better, and too convinced that their suffering is their fault.
History Echoes Loudly
This isn’t new. During the Gilded Age, the wealthiest 0.01% owned nearly 9% of the nation’s wealth while millions of children worked in factories (Business Insider).
Fast forward to today: the top 1.6% now hold nearly half of the $470 trillion in global wealth, while 1.6 billion people share just 0.6% (The Guardian, 2025).
Closing Thought
Giving your kids a financial safety net isn’t wrong—love isn’t the problem. Entitlement is. When wealth isolates children from honest perspectives, and privilege shields them from any consequences- believing kindness is giving a scrap to the less fortunate while never questioning the system that made the scraps necessary.
That's it. No magick in this post; except the soul-deep feeling of solidarity.
Atlas is exhausted. He’s been holding up the world for generations while the rich climb onto his shoulders for a better selfie angle. Maybe it’s time they climbed down and started lifting, too.



Comments